[Bug middle-end/23497] [4.1 regression] Bogus 'is used uninitialized...' warning about std::complex<T>
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Nov 16 18:44:00 GMT 2005
------- Comment #27 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-16 18:44 -------
(In reply to comment #19)
> There are only two choices: either __imag__ is an lvalue, and the code in
> Comment #1 is valid, or __imag__ is not an lvalue, and the compiler should
> issue an error.
>
> Nobody wants to see a warning about an uninitialized variable use on:
>
> __complex__ double t;
> __imag__ t = 0.0;
> __real__ t = 0.0;
>
> If Andrew doesn't like the fact that __imag__ is an lvalue, then Andrew should
> complain to the C front-end maintainers.
>
>From libstdc++ perspective, __imag__ ought to be an lvalue. This is a recurent
issue for C++ complex<>.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23497
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list