[Bug libstdc++/24712] [4.0 Regression] Accidental ABI change between 4.0.1 and 4.0.2?

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Comment #4 from pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-11-08 21:48 -------
(In reply to comment #3)

> Does your comment mean that this configuration is strongly discouraged, or
> that the bug report lacked relevant information?

Neither ;) Not the former, because we are putting a lot of efforts on that
allocator and it can offer substantial performance advantages in many
circumstances; not the latter, because the relevant information could be
easily guessed ;)

Actually, it means that mt is much less tested than the default, much more
complex, and, moreover, that *strictly speaking* we don't provide binary
compatibility guarantees about it. In general, the ABI stability is only
guaranteed for default configurations (of the non-trivial options, of course,
not of --prefix) This doesn't imply that we are not going to look into your
report, of course.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24712