[Bug libstdc++/21334] Lack of Posix compliant thread safety in std::basic_string

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-05-02 12:02 -------
Two quick comments: 1- I'd like to keep open either 10350 or this one, I don't
see much value in keeping open both. Ok? 2- I'm not aware of any real cure for
this kind of problems within a RC implementation. Are you? For what is worth,
in the v7-branch there is already a basic_string framework for flexible memory
management policies and I have already prototyped an additional policy not using
RC at all. I'm planning to add it the repository very soon. This is stuff that
breaks the 3.4/4.0 ABI of course, but if people want it we can envisage providing
it as an extension in future 4.0.x releases.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21334