[Bug c++/20589] error: '<anonymous enum>' is/uses anonymous type'

[caolanm at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat dot com  2005-03-23 11:53 -------
The workaround is trivial. But I'm still confused as to what exactly causes gcc
to treat unnamed enums so much differently that named ones. It would be great if
I could get some clarity on this. I have a handful of cases like this in the
openoffice.org code base and OOo is reluctant to take the patches to fix unless
sure it's currently invalid.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20589