[Bug target/20540] "-march=i386" doesn't mean "limit instruction set to what 80386 understands"
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 18 21:42:00 GMT 2005
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:42 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why do you think movzbl is not an instruction on i386?
Just one more nore, movzbl is the same as movzx. This is where AT&T vs Intel asm format is different.
So this is not a bug.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list