[Bug target/20540] "-march=i386" doesn't mean "limit instruction set to what 80386 understands"

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Mar 18 21:42:00 GMT 2005


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-03-18 21:42 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why do you think movzbl is not an instruction on i386?

Just one more nore, movzbl is the same as movzx.  This is where AT&T vs Intel asm format is different.

So this is not a bug.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list