[Bug c++/20280] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:368

[jason at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com  2005-03-08 06:47 -------
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0800, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

> Your reading is logical, but it depends on exactly what "lvalue for a
> bit-field" means.  (Note that it does not say "lvalue *is* a bit-field"; it
> says "lvalue *for* a bit-field".)

In fact, there's a core issue for exactly that question; Steve's proposed
wording clarifies that these expressions are lvalues for a bit-field.

Jason


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20280