[Bug c/20258] error generated for storage class specified for function parameter

[schlie at comcast dot net]

------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net  2005-03-01 15:20 -------
Subject: Re:  error generated for storage class specified for
 function parameter

> - Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk  2005-03-01
>> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic that "static const"
>> already does just that, as it specifies the storage class and access
> 
> What if it were the pointer that was like this?  You need a type
> qualifier, not a storage class.

- unless I misunderstand the question, the only way a pointer itself would
  be stored in ROM were if it were itself a static const value, and in turn
  would itself need to be referenced by a (static const *), where once
  referenced, (i.e. the pointer's value is now in a non-static variable) so
  it itself never be further qualified (I think)?




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20258