[Bug libstdc++/22200] numeric_limits<signed>::is_modulo is inconsistend with gcc

[gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-27 16:21 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> INT_MAX/-1 is undefined.
> and signed overflow is undefined.
> 
> Why file this bug when the comments on the list say this is not a bug?

(In reply to comment #5)
> Actually it is modulo for all operations.  
> and INT_MAX/-1 does not raise a trap.

Andrew --

You do not seem to understand this PR.  Please DO NOT close it.
Your eagerness to close PRs is doing harms -- that was already debated
last couple o weeks and I do not want to repeat that again.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22200