[Bug middle-end/22072] bizarre code for int*int/2

[pluto at agmk dot net]

------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net  2005-06-15 14:47 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> 
> > Why are the two instructions after the imull emitted?  Shouldn't this become
> > simply imull and sarl?
> 
> No. A signed division by two is not a shift.

what about *arithmetic shift* instruction (e.g. SAR on ix86) ?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22072