[Bug tree-optimization/22630] [4.1 Regression] vrp produces wrong code
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Jul 23 16:38:00 GMT 2005
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-23 16:36 -------
Confirmed.
For some reason we fold:
Folding predicate p_1 != r_2 to 0
Folded statement: if (p_1 != r_2) goto <L2>; else goto <L3>;
into: if (0) goto <L2>; else goto <L3>;
p_1: ~[0B, 0B] EQUIVALENCES: { r_2 } (1 elements)
r_2: VARYING
q_3: [r_2, r_2] EQUIVALENCES: { r_2 } (1 elements)
p_4: [r_2, r_2] EQUIVALENCES: { r_2 } (1 elements)
r_7: ~[0B, 0B] EQUIVALENCES: { r_2 } (1 elements)
# p_1 = PHI <r_7(5), &j(1)>;
<L1>:;
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-23 16:36:51
date| |
Summary|vrp produces wrong code |[4.1 Regression] vrp
| |produces wrong code
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22630
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list