[Bug tree-optimization/22623] New: [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C fails

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jul 22 22:58:00 GMT 2005


FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C (test for excess errors)

has appeared on mainline on multiple platforms (i686-pc-linux-gnu,
ia64-hp-hpux11.23 at least) on 20050722.

/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:
In function 'void foo()':
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:32:
error: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol
while verifying SSA_NAME __t$real_84 in statement
#   VUSE <SFT.296_137>;
__t$real_84 = REALPART_EXPR <D.35336._M_value>;
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:32:
error: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol
while verifying SSA_NAME __t$imag_85 in statement
__t$imag_85 = __t$imag_136;
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:32:
error: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:32:
error: missing definition
for SSA_NAME: __t$real_84 in statement:
__t_86 = COMPLEX_EXPR <__t$real_84, __t$imag_85>;
/scratch/gcc/nightly-2005-07-22-mainline/src/gcc-mainline/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C:32:
internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

-- 
           Summary: [4.1 Regression] g++.old-deja/g++.other/unchanging1.C
                    fails
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22623



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list