[Bug pending/19514] bogus warning about complex "integer" types from typedef

[joseph at codesourcery dot com]

------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com  2005-01-18 23:52 -------
Subject: Re:  bogus warning about complex "integer" types
 from typedef

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, stevenj at fftw dot org wrote:

> Okay, I guess I see what you mean.  "double" in "double _Complex" is 
> arguably not a "type", but rather a type-specifier as defined in 6.7.2, 
> and the "each list of type-specifiers shall be one of the following sets",
> a prescribed list of combinations that does not include typedefs.

Yes, that's my point.  "double _Complex" is one valid list of type 
specifiers.  "typedef name" is another, listed separately - a single type 
specifier, not part of any valid combinations.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19514