[Bug c++/19249] abstract classes should not access virtually inherited class constructor

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-01-14 03:08 -------
Quoting the standard again (the same passage which we all quoted):
"A mem-initializer naming a virtual base class shall be ignored during
execution of the constructor of any class that is not the most derived
class."

A mem-initializer is always implicated for base cases even if not named explicitly.

So this is still invalid code in my mind.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249