[Bug c++/6628] cannot typedef const functions

[austern at apple dot com]

------- Additional Comments From austern at apple dot com  2005-01-03 21:46 -------
9.3/9 isn't the most relevant part of the standard.  Yes, that gives an example showing that this syntax 
is legal, but examples are non-normative.  They're mostly useful for establishing the intent of the 
committee.

The relevant normative text is in 8.3.5/4, which makes it quite clear that cv-qualifiers are allowed in 
typedefs for function types and which explains what they mean.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6628