[Bug tree-optimization/19723] [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++.

[law at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com  2005-02-01 01:04 -------
This testcase (from Ranjit) should give an error on the bogus case label:

int foo(int x)
{
  switch(x)
  {
  case 0 % 0:
    return 1;
  default:
    return 2;
  }
}

I'm testing a fix for both problems.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19723