[Bug rtl-optimization/25609] too agressive printf optimization

[drepper at redhat dot com]

------- Comment #4 from drepper at redhat dot com  2005-12-30 23:06 -------
No, it's *NOT* undefined.  The libc interface decides what is defined and what
is not and it is *EXPLICITLY* documented that NULL pointers are printed as
(null).

The standard might leave it undefined but this does *NOT* mean the
implementation cannot define it.


-- 

drepper at redhat dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|DUPLICATE                   |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25609