------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 12:06 ------- Oops, sorry for not RTFSing before posting the comment here. All I did was verify that x86_64 doesn't remove useless ANDs. Should we add new peepholes or insns patterns to i386 for this too? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25268