[Bug middle-end/23237] [4.1 Regression] -O1 rejects valid code (xxx causes a section type conflict).

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-08-24 17:12 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> It seems like TREE_CONSTANT has the semantics we're looking for (value doesn't change) instead of 
> TREE_READONLY, but I think someone more familiar with this pass (perhaps the author, Kenneth 
> Zadeck?)  would have to make that judgement.

Actually TREE_READONLY is correct and TREE_CONSTANT is incorrect to use this context (there was a 
discussion about this before but I cannot find it).

TREE_CONSTANT is not set by the way on "static const" variables in C anyways, only TREE_READONLY.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23237