[Bug libstdc++/21244] Confusion in template instantiation

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2005-04-27 09:37 -------
Yes, you are right, but I don't want to fiddle too much with that constant, in
particular risking to change its size (the standard doesn't guarantee that the
underlying type of that anonymous enum is int), seems safer just changing the
enum to be named.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21244