[Bug libstdc++/20758] operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&)

[gdr at integrable-solutions dot net]

------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net  2005-04-06 08:59 -------
Subject: Re:  operator-(const T&, const complex<T>&) vs operator-(const complex<T>&, const complex<T>&)

"pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| Gaby, what do you think about this issue? In fact, it seems to me that an
| implementation strictly following the standard (26.2.6/6), or complex1.patch
| here, doesn't not incur in this problem...

I think we need more careful analysis and tracking of both C99, C++ and
LIA-3.  Coming to think about it, Bruce I still own you a reply about
the logarithm ; I'll send you all references I have in a separate
mail.

-- Gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758