[Bug c++/19199] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong warning about returning a reference to a temporary
mark at codesourcery dot com
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Apr 4 23:01:00 GMT 2005
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-04-04 23:01 -------
Subject: Re: [Committed] PR c++/19199: Preserve COND_EXPR lvalueness in fold
Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> If you find that reviewing patch proposals is wasting your time, I'm
> sorry.
Of course, untested patches should be clearly marked as such, which
yours always are. Given that, I don't feel like you're wasting my time
with such a posting; if I see something obviously disconcerting I can
comment. However, I do find that I'm less interested in reviewing such
patches. So, from my point of view, I'd prefer that you post most
patches after a full test cycle.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19199
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list