[Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2

[tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-27 19:56 -------
>From a follow-up mail to the one I referenced before, numbers with -ffast-math
only, no optimization

 CST drivers:      1 out of  11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
 CST drivers:      2 out of  11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
 CBD:      1 out of   4085 tests failed to pass the threshold
 CLS drivers:   4050 out of  65268 tests failed to pass the threshold
 DES:    2 out of  3264 tests failed to pass the threshold
 DSX:    2 out of  3494 tests failed to pass the threshold
 DXV drivers:    200 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
 SXV drivers:     37 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold
 SST drivers:      1 out of  14256 tests failed to pass the threshold
 ZXV drivers:     24 out of   5000 tests failed to pass the threshold

The only change is that CLS got even worse. Actually, I find it surprsing that
there are changes, I would have assumed that -ffast-math only comes into play
when optimizing.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5900