[Bug c++/15036] [3.4 regression] Performance and code size regression compared to 3.3

[digitalmastrmind at hotmail dot com]

------- Additional Comments From digitalmastrmind at hotmail dot com  2004-09-17 23:23 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
Started the build this morning, tried my simplistic benchmark tonight with the 
new GCC build...

Thanks, this appears to have done a small miracle and made 3.4.2 5-10% faster 
than my 3.3.4 was... but it still lags ~5% behind 3.2.2 for hash_set though. 
(that 3.2.2 is from stock/up2date RH9 packages, the others are from sources 
with -O2 for GCC and -O2 -g for C/C++ libs.)

Does this mean that allocator pool used to be the default in 3.3.x and this 
behavior got dropped along the way to 3.4.x? (this certainly is what comparing 
the 3.3.4 c++configure.h file with the 3.4.2 version is hinting - I would be 
curious to read the reason(s).)

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15036