[Bug tree-optimization/17474] [4.0 Regression] Compiling at -01 yields different results
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Tue Sep 14 06:07:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-14 06:07 -------
These all look wrong:
- T.235_214 = codes_85->data[i_910];
+ codes_880 = T.291_849;
+ T.235_214 = *codes_880;
- codes_85->data[i_910] = code_19;
+ T.287_876 = &codes_85->data[0];
+ T.288_873 = (<unnamed type>) i_910;
+ T.289_856 = (int *) T.288_873;
+ T.290_851 = T.289_856 * 4B;
+ T.291_849 = T.290_851 + T.287_876;
+ codes_847 = T.291_849;
+ codes_847->length = code_298;
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Component|java |tree-optimization
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17474
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list