[Bug c++/17232] classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337

[giovannibajo at libero dot it]

------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-09-06 13:43 -------
(In reply to comment #12)
Jason:

>   template<typename T>
>   class A { 
>     virtual void f() = 0;
>   }; 
>   A<int>(*p)[1];
>
> Is the compiler required to diagnose this?  If so, simply creating an array
> type requires that the element type be instantiated.  I think that this is
> the right answer, but I also think it's worth discussing with the
> committee.

I agree too. GCC does not diagnose this case yet, we prolly need to complete 
the type in create_array_type_for_decl. If you want, I can prepare such a 
patch, and this issue can be tracked in another PR.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232