[Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly
jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Wed Oct 20 23:03:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk 2004-10-20 23:03 -------
Subject: Re: C integer promotion semantics /
front end problems.
I presume you sent your message directly to me by mistake, so am sending
the reply back to the bug database so it can benefit more than one person.
Technical messages about public GCC versions should, absent any more
specific support arrangements in a particular case, go to the mailing
lists, not individuals; questions are answered in public GCC development
for the benefit of the public.
On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Paul Schlie wrote:
> Sorry to do this to you again, but where do you see in the standard the
> requirement to promote, or license to needlessly promote all operands
> to int?
C99 subclause 6.3.1.1 paragraph 2. signed char has rank less than that of
int, so it *must* be promoted to int. What happens afterwards is nothing
to do with the front end. The front end does *too many* optimisations; it
should purely generate GIMPLE representing the standard meaning of the
code and leave it to the later stages to tell that such conversions - or
indeed conversions between int and long where they are the same size - can
be optimised away in some cases.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list