[Bug c/18050] -Wsequence-point reports false positives

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Oct 18 22:45:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-18 22:45 -------
Actually the patch will not work when we start warning about full expression, here is the patch just to 
give an example of what the final patch would look like:
Index: c-common.c
===============================================================
====
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/c-common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.578
diff -u -p -r1.578 c-common.c
--- c-common.c	16 Oct 2004 22:58:45 -0000	1.578
+++ c-common.c	18 Oct 2004 22:42:30 -0000
@@ -1358,6 +1358,16 @@ verify_tree (tree x, struct tlist **pbef
 	add_tlist (pno_sp, t->cache_after_sp, NULL_TREE, 1);
 	return;
       }
+    
+    case ADDR_EXPR:
+      {
+	x = TREE_OPERAND (x, 0);
+	if (DECL_P (x))
+	  return;
+	writer = 0;
+	goto restart;
+      }
+      return;
 
     default:
       /* For other expressions, simply recurse on their operands.


Here is the test which I was taking about:
struct x
{
  int i;
};
void g(int, int *);
void f(struct x *y)
{
  g(y->i++, &y->i); /* {dg-bogus "undefined" } */
}

Here is another where we should warn:
struct x
{
  int i;
};
void g(int, int *);
void f(struct x *y)
{
  g((y++)->i, &y->i); /* { dg-warning "undefined" } */
}

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot  |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
                   |org                         |dot org
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18050



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list