[Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand)

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Thu Oct 14 14:07:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-14 14:07 -------
Unless someone can prove that eh part of remove_useless_stmt does not matter any more because of 
the lowering of eh, I think the patch is wrong.  Maybe we can move the eh part into the lowering of the 
eh and then we don't have to worry about that if we don't do it alreay.

Doing CFG already does the some parts of remove_useless_stmt and cfg_remove_useless_stmt does the 
conditional part already. I think eh lowering does the rest so maybe we can remove this compile time 
problem.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-10-14 14:07:16
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17967



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list