[Bug rtl-optimization/17107] Opportunity to improve code generated for complex logical expression

[nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-12 10:38 -------
It occurs to me that converting && to & (when safe) is a lose on targets that
do not have setcond instructions.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17107