[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles

[pcarlini at suse dot de]

------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-10-11 23:50 -------
> It would be list.... ugh. Damn that allocator rebinding! I'm developing severe
> issues with this particular container. Well, this kills off this QoI
> improvement. I've reverted this on mainline, and fixed up the testcases that
> test for this to be of the type that showed this, more advanced, problem. 

Many thanks.

> I'm going to keep the infrastructure in __mt_alloc to do the actual
> deallocations, however. At least, for the time being.

Ok, but as long as we don't use that, let's avoid taking the lock a second
time in _M_reserve_block, the new calls and so on... I propose to protect
with macros or #if 0 or whatelse those snippets too.

Thanks again.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17937