[Bug c++/17788] poor diagnostic for missing reference initializer

Sat Oct 2 12:26:00 GMT 2004

------- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-02 12:26 -------
confirmed. [12.1]/7 says each class gets an implicitly declared default ctor,
unless there's a user declared one.  It then goes on to say that if that ctor
is illformed, it's an error when it is used.

My guess is that Mark's lazy ctor decl work might have caused this (if
it's a recent failure)

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-10-02 12:26:51
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17788