[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr

[rth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-25 22:44 -------
Then I think that we have to assume that the result of L_R_A is not offsettable.

Even in the case of rs6000, I believe the definition is only *usually*
offsettable, but that this is not a 100% iron-clad guarantee.  In particular,
an offset like 0x17fff would get rendered as 0x10000 + 0x7fff, and there's no
room left in the low part for any further offsetting.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18641