[Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions

[paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr]

------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr  2004-11-14 18:04 -------
Subject: Re:  new/delete much slower than malloc/free because
 of sjlj exceptions


Ken,

Did you miss the question?

Paul

>>(iii) gcc 4.0.0 20041010 (experimental) I get 0.62 and 0.59micro-sec/new
>>
>>This latter was a tad unexpected - I built in from a snapshot on one of the
>>German mirror sites.  Does this imply that I have picked up Dwarf2 as a
>>default?
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>





-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563