[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-12 13:54 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> > I just says it has to be accessable
> so, if gcc dont use copy ctor - what for it complains ?! 
Because this is the requirement of the C++ standard.

> and why is it error btw ?
because we could use the ctor if we wantted to in this case but we don't so the requirement of the C++ 
standard says it has to be accessable.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448