[Bug c++/14668] [3.4/3.5 Regression] declaration of `A*B::A' changes meaning of `A' from `class A'...

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-03-24 23:23 -------
Hm, I may be blind today, but I fail to see what may be wrong with this 
code? (Clearly the initialization of the member has nothing to do with 
the problem here.) Gaby, do you refer to the "after declaration, reevaluate 
the declaration with the newly defined name and see whether it is still 
valid" rule? Or what do you refer to in saying that the code is invalid? 
 
W. 

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14668