[Bug libstdc++/9679] Strange behaviour of valarray::apply method

pcarlini at suse dot de gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Mar 20 09:27:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de  2004-03-20 09:27 -------
Hi again, and thanks for the additional details.

> It is clearly "Not a bug" with current C++ (either 98 or 2003 would do).

Ok.

> With the DR I submitted, and that would be accepted as part of C++0x,
> it would become a bug in the lirbary ; but it would be a bug only
> because I did not anticipate that part when making the new proposed
> wording.  Let me be clear:  Before my proposal, the PR is invalid
> because the code is ill-formed.  With my proposal as currently worded,
> the code would become valid (but I did not intend it to be valid).

Indeed, you already pointed out this issue in your old message but
I didn't fully understand it, sorry.

Now, March, 2004, your DR is in the [Ready] status! Since its implications
are quite important (for this PR too), first I want to document that in
the sources, and point to 389. Moreover, as you often repeated in the past,
[Ready] resolutions must be implemented and, for all practical purposes,
must be considered part of the standard we are implementing. This means,
the status of this PR, strictly speaking, right now seems to me more a
plain "Open". But I fully get your point about the need for a follow up to
your DR 389, so let's keep it Suspended. Could you please keep us up to
date about the iter of the issue with the committee?

Thanks again

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9679



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list