[Bug c/14374] valid unamed struct in a union rejected by gcc

[jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk]

------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk  2004-03-02 01:04 -------
Subject: Re:  New: valid unamed struct in a union rejected by
 gcc

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, ahs3 at fc dot hp dot com wrote:

> typedef union {
>    struct a;
>    struct b;
> } MD;


I don't see how you get this to match the syntax for union declarations
(6.7.2.1) at all.  A member name can only be omitted for bit-fields; the 
syntax simply doesn't allow it otherwise.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14374