[Bug c++/16232] Poor diagnostic

igodard at pacbell dot net gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Jun 27 17:48:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net  2004-06-27 17:48 -------
Should 16232 and 16233 really be consolidated? They are two different problems as far as I can see: #16232 is syntactically correct but ambiguous, and should be reported as such; #16233 is syntactically incorrect, which seems a different error to me.

Ivan

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16232



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list