[Bug c++/16232] Poor diagnostic
igodard at pacbell dot net
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Jun 27 17:48:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2004-06-27 17:48 -------
Should 16232 and 16233 really be consolidated? They are two different problems as far as I can see: #16232 is syntactically correct but ambiguous, and should be reported as such; #16233 is syntactically incorrect, which seems a different error to me.
Ivan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16232
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list