[Bug c++/16190] spurious warning about non-virtual destructor

[Gabriel Dos Reis]

You Wrote

> I would claim that in most cases the compiler warning is actually
> justified.

No, it is not.  Which is the whole point of the issue.

> The question what we put into -Wall is always a judgment call, so

The point is not whether the warning is in -Wall, but whether
it makes sense most of the time.  The answer is no, it does
not.

The PR should be reopen.