[Bug target/16130] [3.4 Regression]: Gcc 3.4 ICE on valid code
hjl at lucon dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Fri Jun 25 08:28:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-06-25 07:44 -------
I noticed those regressions while compiling 2.6.7 kernel for Itantium 1. I
agree that a single bug report is better than many separate ones in this
case. But I was told that I should open separate ones.
I doubt there are many Itanium 1 machines left in production use. If people
want to use Itanium 1, they can stick with the older gccs. Or they should
upgrade their machines. I don't think many people will mind if the new gcc
stops supporting Itanium 1. I think disable Itanium 1 DFA is a good idea for
gcc 3.4. We can remove it from mainline.
Binutils is different. People with Itanium 1 machines still need improved
assembler and linker. But they don't necessarily need to upgrade gcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16130
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list