[Bug c++/16090] New: fails to flag missing copy constructor (or generate one?)

[igodard at pacbell dot net]

The code blows up at link time due to the absence of a copy constructor. Correct; there isn't one. But if one was required explicit in the source there should have been an error message at compile time, and if one was not required then there should have been one automatically generated and the link should not have failed. Take your pick :-)

Ivan

-- 
           Summary: fails to flag missing copy constructor (or generate
                    one?)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: igodard at pacbell dot net
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16090