[Bug c++/16295] -pedantic option resolves compiler error "sorry, unimplemented: ..."

[bernd dot speiser at uni-tuebingen dot de]

------- Additional Comments From bernd dot speiser at uni-tuebingen dot de  2004-07-01 11:30 -------

(In reply to comment #8)

I'm the original writer of this code, so I'll comment on the third parameter.

> And as a last note: If I fix the code like so:
>
> template<template<class, class> class Q1, class GT1, class Head1,
>            class Tail1, class DU1, class U1,
>          template<class, class> class Q2, class GT2, class Head2,
>            class Tail2, class DU2, class U2, class DT>
>   struct GenerateVariable
>     <Q1<Quantity<GT1, Typelist<Head1, Tail1>, DU1, DT>, U1>,
>                 Q2<Quantity<GT2, Typelist<Head2, Tail2>, DU2, DT>, U2> >
>   {
>      private:
>
>        typedef typename Dimension<GT1>::template Add<Dimension<GT2> >::Class
>                                                                    AddT;
>        typedef NonPrefixable<GenericClass<AddT>, GenericUnit> AddU;
>      //...
>   };
>
> then it compiles cleanly. Note that the 'template' keyword in the declaration
> of AddT is necessary. I removed the erroneous third template parameter
> in the declaration of AddU, but I have of course no clue what you originally
> intended there.

NonPrefixable really takes THREE parameters, with DT being the last one and
having a default value of double. Thus, if you leave it off, as in this example,
then the last parameter to NonPrefixable is just taken as double.

I understand that 3.4 handles the missing `template' keyword now correctly, right?
We'll test this, and report back what we find.

Still, the question remains, why the -pedantic flag results in NOT crashing??
Bernd



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16295