[Bug c++/13005] Pointer wrongly adjusted for derived class containing virtual function

[stephenma at telus dot net]

------- Additional Comments From stephenma at telus dot net  2004-01-10 05:53 -------
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> | > As a matter of existing practrice, we don't say "see xxxx".
> |
> | Omitting the "see xxx" would do more harm than good.  The g++
> | maintainers would be flooded with questions about the warning.
> |
> | If you intend to be rigid about this, please tell me now.  I would
> | prefer to withdraw the patch rather than be blamed by people who do
> | not understand what the warning means.
> 
> I don't mean to be ridig about it. I'm pointing out a fact and would
> like that to be taken into account, when you will be submitting a
> revised version.

OK, I will consider it, but I have good reasons to prefer leaving in
the cross reference.

As I said to Wolfgang a few messages back, if you or anyone else could
explain why there is such an objection to "see xxxx", I would
appreciate it.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13005