[Bug target/14333] [3.3 Regression] __stdcall in function declaration in structure ignored?

[buytenh at gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From buytenh at gnu dot org  2004-02-28 21:24 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3 Regression] __stdcall in function declaration in structure ignored?

Gah, Danny is right.

1. void __stdcall (*example_method)(void);
2. void (__stdcall * example_method)(void);
3. void (* __stdcall example_method)(void);

Indeed, (2) does the right thing, while in (1) and (3) the __stdcall seems
to be just ignored.

If (1) and (3) are wrong, can we make them throw a warning for the unsuspecting
user?  Or does (1) and (3)'s way of using __stdcall specify an even subtly
different meaning?  Maybe it's just better altogether to make (1) and (3) do
the same thing as (2)?




-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14333