[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr

uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Dec 5 15:45:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-12-05 15:45 -------
Basically yes, except that it's not only about CONST_DOUBLE,
but also CONST_INT.  Maybe even:

((CONSTANT_P (X) && reg_classes_intersect_p ((CLASS), FLOAT_REGS))
 ? NO_REGS : ...)

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18641



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list