[Bug middle-end/18641] [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg into f0 for a DImode expr
uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sun Dec 5 15:45:00 GMT 2004
------- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-05 15:45 -------
Basically yes, except that it's not only about CONST_DOUBLE,
but also CONST_INT. Maybe even:
((CONSTANT_P (X) && reg_classes_intersect_p ((CLASS), FLOAT_REGS))
? NO_REGS : ...)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18641
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list