[Bug c/18814] Incorrect reinitialization of compound literal

[austern at apple dot com]

------- Additional Comments From austern at apple dot com  2004-12-03 20:22 -------
I don't think this is the most natural interpretation.  The line
  p = &((int) {1});
sets p to the address of the literal, and at the point we reach it for the second time the literal itself has 
been changed.

It might be useful to get an explicit ruling from the C committee, though.  The whole idea of changing 
literals is sufficiently odd that it's hard to even talk about this.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18814