[Bug c++/6424] [DR 339] sizeof() with overload resolution

[bangerth at dealii dot org]

------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-08-09 15:44 -------
Ah, ok, what you quote Mark says makes sense. 
 
> Yes, but you must be able to define those two functions in two different  
> translation units, instantiate them, and link the whole program without  
> getting a symbol conflict. 
 
But that assumes that the two signatures I mentioned actually refer to 
two different functions. However, I don't see why that should be so, though 
answering that question is completely off-topic for this PR and we shouldn't 
do it here. 
 
W. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6424