[Bug c++/15011] partial ordering failure?

Tue Apr 20 02:28:00 GMT 2004

------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it  2004-04-20 01:38 -------
Nathan, you worked on partial ordering lately. Care commenting on this bug? My 
current understanding is that GCC is wrong as T& (or T volatile &) is more 
specialized than T.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15011