[Bug c++/13294] [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations

[mark at codesourcery dot com]

------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com  2004-04-16 18:34 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs. specializations

bkoz at redhat dot com wrote:

>------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com  2004-04-14 04:08 -------
>Subject: Re:  [3.4 Regression] namespace associations vs.
> specializations
>
>
>  
>
>>(It appears to me that this outcome means that standards-conforming programs do
>>not follow the C++ ABI in that specializations of types in "std" are mangled
>>incorrectly.  That's observable to user programs by using "typeid".  This is
>>presumably a bug in our library implementation, but one that's not easy to fix,
>>and hopefully not terribly important to anybody.)
>>
>>Thank you for persevering with this issue; without having gone this far, we
>>probably would not have known what the issues were.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm wondering if we should punt on this stuff for 3.4.0, and revert to STL in namespace std.
>
Do we know how to do that?



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13294