[Bug c++/14885] Improper delete/free of local variables undetected

ndeb at ece dot cmu dot edu gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Sat Apr 10 02:36:00 GMT 2004


------- Additional Comments From ndeb at ece dot cmu dot edu  2004-04-09 23:21 -------
(In reply to comment #6)   
> "PR" means "problem report", i.e. "bug report".   
>    
> I don't mean to sweep it under the rug.    
 
You did exactly that by closing the bug as "won't fix". What harm does an open   
bug report do ?   
 
> My intention was this: we have   
> serious bugs where we fail to accept valid C++ code, or generate wrong code.   
> These bugs are way more important.    
   
It may be less important to you but there are others who feel its important   
enough to deserve a report. Closing a report because you think its unimportant   
is not very helpful.  
   
> If we have fixed all these, we can still   
> come around and invent techniques to diagnose user errors that probably   
> require solving the halting problem to catch all cases.   
>    
> If this is of critical importance, feel free to pay one of the gcc   
developers   
> to implement this. I personally do not assign it significant importance, so   
> I go with Gaby's opinion to close the PR.   
 
Nobody demanded that _you_ fix this within 24 hours so why this display of "I   
have far more important stuff to do" ? If you do not want to fix it, please   
leave it for others to look at. The purpose of the bug report is to make users  
aware of the problem.  
 
Perhaps next time, you can mark such bugs as "resolved unimportant" (assuming   
bugzilla gives such an option).  

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14885



More information about the Gcc-bugs mailing list